基于扰动响应的自适应集成黑盒对抗攻击算法

冯卫栋; 余东; 张淳杰; 郑晓龙

doi:10.16383/j.aas.c250034

基于扰动响应的自适应集成黑盒对抗攻击算法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250034 cstr: 32138.14.j.aas.c250034

冯卫栋^{1, 2,},
余东^{1, 2,},
张淳杰^{1, 2,},
郑晓龙^{3, 4, 5,}

1.
北京交通大学计算机科学与技术学院信息科学研究所北京 100044
2.
北京交通大学视觉智能交叉创新教育部国际合作联合实验室北京 100044
3.
中国科学院自动化研究所多模态人工智能系统全国重点实验室北京 100190
4.
中国科学院自动化研究所复杂系统管理与控制国家重点实验室北京 100190
5.
中国科学院大学北京 100190

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(62476021, 72225011, 72434005, 62072026), 多模态人工智能系统全国重点实验室开放课题基金(MAIS2024106)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
冯卫栋：北京交通大学计算机科学与技术学院信息科学研究所硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为对抗攻防技术, 图像理解. E-mail: 22120344@bjtu.edu.cn

余东：北京交通大学计算机科学与技术学院信息科学研究所博士研究生, 主要研究方向图像融合, 图像理解. E-mail: 23115071@bjtu.edu.cn

张淳杰：北京交通大学计算机科学与技术学院信息科学研究所教授. 主要研究方向为图像处理与理解, 计算机视觉和多媒体数据处理与分析. 本文通信作者. E-mail: cjzhang@bjtu.edu.cn

郑晓龙：中国科学院自动化研究所研究员. 主要研究方向为大数据与社会计算和多模态数据感知与理解. E-mail: xiaolong.zheng@ia.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 12
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-01-22
- 录用日期: 2025-06-09
- 网络出版日期: 2025-07-15

Perturbation Response-based Adaptive Ensemble Black-box Adversarial Attack Algorithm

FENG Wei-Dong^{1, 2
,},
YU Dong^{1, 2
,},
ZHANG Chun-Jie^{1, 2
,},
ZHENG Xiao-Long^{3, 4, 5
,}

1.
Institute of Information Science, School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
2.
Visual Intelligence + X International Cooperation Joint Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
3.
State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
4.
State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
5.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62476021, 72225011, 72434005, 62072026), and Open Projects Program of State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS2024106)

More Information

Author Bio:
FENG Wei-Dong　Master student at the Institute of Information Science, School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University. His research interest is adversarial Attack-Defense Techniques, image understanding

YU Dong　Ph. D. candidate at the Institute of Information Science, School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University. His main research interest is information fusion, image understanding

ZHANG Chun-Jie　Professor at Institute of Information Science, School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University. His research interest covers image processing and understanding, computer vision and multimedia data processing and analysis. Corresponding author of this paper

ZHENG Xiao-Long　Professor at the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research interest covers big data and social computing as well as multimodal data sensing and understanding

摘要

摘要: 模型集成对抗攻击通过整合多个替代模型的梯度信息, 能够显著增强对抗样本的跨模型迁移能力, 是当前黑盒攻击中最具潜力的策略之一. 然而, 现有集成方法在动态加权过程中通常依赖扰动引起的预测误差作为权重依据, 未能有效区分扰动作用与模型自身固有误差. 由此可能高估低质量模型对扰动优化的贡献, 干扰攻击方向, 进而削弱对抗样本的实际迁移效果. 提出了基于扰动响应的自适应集成黑盒对抗攻击算法(Perturbation response-based adaptive ensemble black-box adversarial attack algorithm, PRA-EA). 首先, 设计了扰动响应感知的权重分配策略(Perturbation response-aware weight allocation, PRA-WA), 通过引入KL散度与集成相似度指标来衡量扰动对模型输出的真实影响, 避免低质量模型对集成过程的负面干扰. 其次, 提出梯度协同扰动缩放策略(Gradient-collaborative based perturbation scaling, GCPS), 结合像素级梯度一致性度量, 动态调整扰动幅度, 缓解集成过程中的局部过拟合现象, 增强对抗样本在多模型间的泛化能力. 最后, 在多个黑盒攻击任务中进行系统评估, 实验结果表明所提出的基于扰动响应的自适应集成黑盒对抗攻击算法在迁移性能、攻击成功率与扰动效率方面均显著优于现有方法.
- 对抗样本 /
- 集成攻击 /
- 梯度 /
- 黑盒模型
Abstract: Model integration adversarial attacks enhance the cross-model transferability of adversarial samples by aggregating the gradient information of multiple substitute models, and are among the most promising strategies in current black-box attacks. However, existing methods typically use prediction errors caused by perturbations as weights during dynamic integration, failing to distinguish the impact of perturbations from models＇ inherent errors. This may overestimate the contribution of low-quality models, mislead the attack direction, and weaken actual transferability. We propose a perturbation response-based adaptive ensemble black-box adversarial attack algorithm (PRA-EA). First, we introduce a perturbation response-aware weight allocation strategy (PRA-WA), which leverages KL divergence and an ensemble similarity metric to assess the true effect of perturbations on model outputs, avoiding interference from low-quality models. Second, we propose a gradient-collaborative perturbation scaling strategy (GCPS), which uses pixel-level gradient consistency to dynamically adjust perturbation magnitude, mitigating local overfitting and improving adversarial generalization across models. Finally, comprehensive evaluations on multiple black-box attack tasks show that our proposed PRA-EA algorithm significantly outperforms existing methods in transferability, success rate, and perturbation efficiency.
- Adversarial examples /
- ensemble attacks /
- gradient /
- black-box model

HTML全文

图 1 PRA-EA结构图.

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of PRA-EA.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 对抗攻击的收敛过程

Fig. 2 The convergence process of adversarial attacks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 迭代过程中的权重变换趋势

Fig. 3 The trend of weight transformation during the iterative process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同eps取值下的攻击成功率(%)与PSNR

Fig. 4 Attack Success Rate (%) and PSNR under Different Values of eps

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同eps取值下的攻击成功率(%)与SSIM

Fig. 5 Attack Success Rate (%) and SSIM under Different Values of eps

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 AdaEA与PRA-EA生成的对抗样本对比

Fig. 6 Comparison of Adversarial Samples Generated by AdaEA and PRA-EA

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 调节参数γ对对抗样本攻击性能的影响

Fig. 7 The Impact of Adjusting Parameter γ on the Performance of Adversarial Sample Attacks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 攻击步长α对对抗样本攻击性能的影响

Fig. 8 The Impact of Attack Step Size α on the Performance of Adversarial Sample Attacks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 7个在CIFAR-10上自然训练模型在黑盒攻击下的分类准确率(%)

Table 1 Classification accuracy (%) of 7 naturally trained models on CIFAR-10 under black-box attacks

数据集	攻击算法	Res-50	WRN101-2	BiT-50	BiT-101	ViT-B	DeiT-B	Swin-B	Avg
	NoAttack	97.56	97.58	94.34	94.24	98.61	98.39	98.86	97.08
CIFAR-10	AdaEA	42.13	65.09	67.99	71.85	74.37	50.24	61.13	61.83
	PRA-EA	37.76	61.37	64.35	68.19	64.36	39.9	50.01	55.13

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 9个在ImageNet上自然训练模型在黑盒攻击下的分类准确率(%)

Table 3 Classification Accuracy (%) of 9 naturally trained models on ImageNet under black-box attacks

数据集	攻击算法	Res-50	WRN101-2	BiT-50	BiT-101	ViT-B	DeiT-B	Swin-B	Conv	Effi	Avg
	NoAttack	74.55	77.92	72.76	74.89	84.8	81.26	84.29	83.64	76.93	79.01
ImageNet	AdaEA	26.97	39.51	35.97	43.43	55.18	42.13	63.16	53.65	38.41	44.26
	PRA-EA	25.82	32.55	30.07	37.24	48.48	34.28	60.04	52.84	37.59	39.88

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 4个在ImageNet-21K上自然训练模型在黑盒攻击下的分类准确率(%)

Table 4 Classification accuracy (%) of 4 naturally trained models on ImageNet-21K under black-box attacks

数据集	集成模型	攻击算法	BiT-101	ViT-B	Swin-B	Conv	Avg
ImageNet-21K	BiT-50, Effi Vit-T, Swin-S	NoAttack	73.28	82.65	83.43	82.88	80.56
		AdaEA	42.57	53.77	64.08	52.97	53.35
		PRA-EA	36.58	47.32	59.67	52.64	49.05

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 在目标识别任务下的黑盒攻击效果

Table 5 The effectiveness of black - box attacks in the object recognition task

数据集	集成模型	攻击算法	mP	mR	mAp50	mAp
CoCo	yolo5s yolo5m	NoAttack	0.725	0.607	0.657	0.475
		AdaEA	0.112	0.109	0.0549	0.0290
		PRA-EA	0.106	0.105	0.0554	0.0287

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 7个在CIFAR-100上自然训练模型在黑盒攻击下的分类准确率(%)

Table 2 Classification accuracy (%) of 7 naturally trained models on CIFAR-100 under black-box attacks

数据集	攻击算法	Res-50	WRN101-2	BiT-50	BiT-101	ViT-B	DeiT-B	Swin-B	Avg
	NoAttack	85.87	71.95	75.41	72.4	88.4	89.8	92.56	82.34
CIFAR-100	AdaEA	20.63	26.43	33.21	43.1	53.54	34.74	40.03	35.95
	PRA-EA	20.53	25.12	30.23	39.64	46.01	29.36	35.02	32.27

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 集成模型配置

Table 6 Ensemble model configuration

集成模型
配置1	Res-18	Inc-v3	DeiT-T	Vit-T
配置1	69.01	67.3	69.95	72.96
配置2	EfficientNet	Inc-v3	DeiT-T	Vit-T
配置2	76.93	67.3	69.95	72.96
配置3	ConvNeXt	Inc-v3	DeiT-T	Vit-T
配置3	83.64	67.3	69.95	72.96

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 在Imagenet上对比集成模型预测准确率和黑盒攻击成功率(%)

Table 7 Comparison of ensemble model prediction accuracy and black-box attack success rate (%) on ImageNet

集成模型	攻击算法	CNNs				ViTs
集成模型	攻击算法	Res-50	WRN101-2	BiT-101	Avg	ViT-B	DeiT-B	Swin-S	Avg
配置1	AdaEA	63.82	49.30	42.01	51.71	34.93	48.15	25.07	36.05
配置1	PRA-EA	65.37	58.23	50.28	57.96	42.83	57.81	28.77	43.14
配置2	AdaEA	63.58	49.66	42.57	52.94	36.57	49.77	25.79	37.38
配置2	PRA-EA	66.15	59.07	52.16	59.13	45.52	58.15	29.04	44.24
配置3	AdaEA	64.63	51.41	42.82	52.95	38.88	50.15	28.13	39.05
配置3	PRA-EA	66.84	60.01	52.98	59.94	46.59	59.37	30.28	45.41

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 在CIFAR-10上比较不同集成模型类型和数量下AdaEA与本文PRA-EA的平均攻击成功率(%)

Table 8 Comparison of attack success rate (%) of AdaEA and PRA-EA under different ensemble models on CIFAR-10

	集成模型	CNNS	ViTS	攻击算法	CNNS				ViTS
	集成模型	CNNS	ViTS	攻击算法	Res-50	WRN101-2	BiT-101	Avg	ViT-B	DeiT-B	Swin-S	Avg
配置1	Inc-v3 DeiT-T	1	1	AdaEA	22.69	13.28	12.82	16.26	12.48	24.39	15.14	17.34
配置1	Inc-v3 DeiT-T	1	1	PRA-EA	23.58	14.85	14.07	17.50	13.56	25.67	17.09	18.77
配置2	Resnet18 Inc-v3 DeiT-T	2	1	AdaEA	46.00	26.14	17.88	30.01	12.35	24.31	18.83	18.50
配置2	Resnet18 Inc-v3 DeiT-T	2	1	PRA-EA	48.00	26.33	19.76	31.36	12.7	26.22	20.59	19.84
配置3	Inc-v3 DeiT-T ViT-T	1	2	AdaEA	29.28	17.34	15.03	20.55	21.47	42.66	27.34	30.49
配置3	Inc-v3 DeiT-T ViT-T	1	2	PRA-EA	35.85	21.85	20.35	26.02	34.37	59.84	41.60	45.27
配置4	Resnet18 Inc-v3	2	0	AdaEA	33.63	17.07	9.63	20.11	1.44	2.85	5.18	3.16
配置4	Resnet18 Inc-v3	2	0	PRA-EA	34.06	18.2	11.00	21.09	2.91	4.49	6.13	4.51
配置5	ViT-T DeiT-T	0	2	AdaEA	35.94	24.41	24.87	28.41	43.25	69.67	50.20	54.37
配置5	ViT-T DeiT-T	0	2	PRA-EA	39.96	26.20	25.98	30.71	46.64	74.84	53.41	58.30

下载: 导出CSV

表 9 PRA-EA在一些防御方法中的平均攻击成功率(%)

Table 9 The average attack success rate (%) of PRA-EA in some defense methods

防御方法	攻击方法	Inv-3	Resnet101	avg
R&P	AdaEA	21.63	19.51	20.57
R&P	PRA-EA	21.47	21.39	21.43
JPEG	AdaEA	36.58	33.92	35.25
JPEG	PRA-EA	36.72	37.42	37.07
AdvTrain	AdaEA	0.77	0.70	0.74
AdvTrain	PRA-EA	0.79	0.72	0.76

下载: 导出CSV

表 10 PRA-EA中组件消融的平均攻击成功率(%)实验结果

Table 10 The average attack success rate (%) of component ablation experiments in PRA-EA

集成模型	攻击方法	CNNS	ViTs	All
Res-18	Ens	30.58	23.51	27.55
Inc-v3	+PRA-WA	43.76	37.82	40.79
ViT-T	+GCPS	38.68	37.92	38.3
DeiT-T	PRA-EA	57.96	43.14	50.55

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(41)

[1]	Wen L, Wang X, Liu J, Xu Z. Mveb: Self-supervised learning with multi-view entropy bottleneck. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(9): 6097−6108 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3380065
[2]	Li Z, Guo Y, Liu H, Zhang C. A theoretical view of linear backpropagation and its convergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(5): 3972−3980 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3353919
[3]	Kolesnikov A, Beyer L, Zhai X, Puigcerver J, Yung J, Gelly S, et al. Big transfer (bit): General visual representation learning. In: Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Computer Vision. Glasgow, UK: Springer, 2020. 491−507
[4]	王辉, 黄宇廷, 夏玉婷, 范自柱, 罗国亮, 杨辉. 基于视觉属性的多模态可解释图像分类方法. 自动化学报, 2025, 51(2): 445−456 Wang Hui, Huang Yu-Ting, Xia Yu-Ting, Fan Zi-Zhu, Luo Guo-Liang, Yang Hui. Multimodal interpretable image classification method based on visual attributes. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2025, 51(2): 445−456
[5]	Xu Z, Wu D, Yu C, Chu X, Sang N, Gao C. Sctnet: Single-branch cnn with transformer semantic information for real-time segmentation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: AAAI, 2024. 6378−6386
[6]	Zong Y, Zuo Q, Ng M K P, Lei B, Wang S. A new brain network construction paradigm for brain disorder via diffusion-based graph contrastive learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(12): 10389−10403 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3442811
[7]	Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. Virtual Event: 2020. 1−21
[8]	Xia C, Wang X, Lv F, Hao X, Shi Y. Vit-comer: Vision transformer with convolutional multi-scale feature interaction for dense predictions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle, Washington, USA: IEEE, 2024. 5493−5502
[9]	Liu Z, Lin Y, Cao Y, Hu H, Wei Y, Zhang Z, Lin S, Guo B. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Montreal, Canada: IEEE, 2021. 10012−10022
[10]	潘雨辰, 贾克斌, 张铁林. 前额叶皮层启发的Transformer模型应用及其进展. 自动化学报, 2025, 51(5): 1−20 Pan Yu-Chen, Jia Ke-Bin, Zhang Tie-Lin. The application and progress of prefrontal cortex-inspired transformer model. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2025, 51(5): 1−20
[11]	Zhou M, Wang L, Niu Z, Zhang Q, Zheng N, Hua G. Adversarial attack and defense in deep ranking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(8): 5306−5324 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3365699
[12]	王璐瑶, 曹渊, 刘博涵, 曾恩, 刘坤, 夏元清. 时间序列分类模型的集成对抗训练防御方法. 自动化学报, 2025, 51(1): 144−160 Wang Lu-Yao, Cao Yuan, Liu Bo-Han, Zeng En, Liu Kun, Xia Yuan-Qing. Ensemble adversarial training defense for time series classification models. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2025, 51(1): 144−160
[13]	Chen P, Zhang H, Sharma Y, Yi J, Hsieh C J. Zoo: Zeroth order optimization based black-box attacks to deep neural networks without training substitute models. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. Dallas, Texas, USA: ACM, 2017. 15−26
[14]	Xiaosen W, Tong K, He K. Rethinking the backward propagation for adversarial transferability. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. New Orleans, USA: 2023. 1905−1922
[15]	Huang H, Chen Z, Chen H, Wang Y, Zhang K. T-sea: Transfer-based self-ensemble attack on object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE, 2023. 20514−20523
[16]	Chen B, Yin J, Chen S, Chen B, Liu X. An adaptive model ensemble adversarial attack for boosting adversarial transferability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Paris, France: IEEE, 2023. 4489−4498
[17]	Tang B, Wang Z, Bin Y, Dou Q, Yang Y, Shen H T. Ensemble diversity facilitates adversarial transferability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle, Washington, USA: IEEE, 2024. 24377−24386
[18]	Liu Y, Chen X, Liu C, Song D. Delving into transferable adversarial examples and black-box attacks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. Toulon, France: 2017. 2235−2248
[19]	Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I, Bruna J, Erhan D, Goodfellow I, et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: JMLR, 2014. 1−10
[20]	Goodfellow I J, Shlens J, Szegedy C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. Lille, France: JMLR, 2015. 1−11
[21]	Kurakin A, Goodfellow I J, Bengio S. Adversarial examples in the physical world. Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security. Toulon, France: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018. 99−112
[22]	Dong Y, Pang T, Su H, Zhu J. Evading defenses to transferable adversarial examples by translation-invariant attacks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach, California, USA: IEEE, 2019. 4312−4321
[23]	Carlini N, Wagner D. Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. San Jose, USA: IEEE, 2017. 39−57
[24]	Dong Y, Liao F, Pang T, Su H, Zhu J, Hu X, et al. Boosting adversarial attacks with momentum. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Salt Lake City, USA: IEEE, 2018. 9185−9193
[25]	Madry A, Makelov A, Schmidt L, Tsipras D, Vladu A. Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. Vancouver, Canada: 2018. 4138−4160
[26]	Papernot N, McDaniel P, Goodfellow I. Transferability in machine learning: from phenomena to black-box attacks using adversarial samples. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1605.07277, 2016.
[27]	Zhang H, Yu Y, Jiao J, Xing E, El Ghaoui L, Jordan M. Theoretically principled trade-off between robustness and accuracy. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning. Long Beach, California: PMLR, 2019. 7472−7482
[28]	Xie C, Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Bai S, Wang J, Ren Z, et al. Improving transferability of adversarial examples with input diversity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach, California, USA: IEEE, 2019. 2730−2739.
[29]	丁佳, 许智武. 基于 Rectified Adam 和颜色不变性的对抗迁移攻击. 软件学报, 2022, 33(7): 2525−2537 Ding Jia, Xu Zhiwu. Transfer-based adversarial attack with rectified adam and color invariance. Journal of Software, 2022, 33(7): 2525−2537
[30]	Moosavi-Dezfooli S M, Fawzi A, Frossard P. Deepfool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: IEEE, 2016. 2574−2582.
[31]	Tramèr F, Papernot N, Goodfellow I, Boneh D, McDaniel P. The space of transferable adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1704.03453, 2017.
[32]	Fu Y, Liu Z, Lyu J. Transferable adversarial attacks for remote sensing object recognition via spatial-frequency co-transformation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 1−12
[33]	Ilyas A, Engstrom L, Athalye A, Lin J. Black-box adversarial attacks with limited queries and information. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning. Stockholm, Sweden: 2018. 2137−2146.
[34]	Xiong Y, Lin J, Zhang M, Hopcroft J E, He K. Stochastic variance reduced ensemble adversarial attack for boosting the adversarial transferability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New Orleans, USA: IEEE, 2022. 14983−14992
[35]	Ji S, Zhang Z, Ying S, Wang L, Zhao X, Gao Y. Kullback–Leibler divergence metric learning. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2020, 52(4): 2047−2058
[36]	Zhang B, Li L, Wang S, Cai S, Zha Z, Tian Q, et al. Inductive state-relabeling adversarial active learning with heuristic clique rescaling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(12): 9780−9796 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3432099
[37]	Liu J, Yang H, Zhou H, Xi Y, Yu L, Li C, et al. Swin-umamba: Mamba-based unet with imagenet-based pretraining. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Marrakesh, Morocco: Spring, 2024. 615−625
[38]	Liu Z, Mao H, Wu C, Feichtenhofer C, Darrell T, Xie S. A convnet for the 2020s. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New Orleans, USA: IEEE, 2022. 11976−11986
[39]	Tan M, Le Q. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning. Long Beach, California, USA: PMLR, 2019. 6105−6114
[40]	Zhang J, Huang Y, Xu Z, Wu W, Lyu M R. Improving the adversarial transferability of vision transformers with virtual dense connection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, Canada: AAAI, 2024. 7133−7141
[41]	徐昌凯, 冯卫栋, 张淳杰, 郑晓龙, 张辉, 王飞跃. 针对身份证文本识别的黑盒攻击算法研究. 自动化学报, 2024, 50(1): 103−120 Xu Chang-Kai, Feng Wei-Dong, Zhang Chun-Jie, Zheng Xiao-Long, Zhang Hui, Wang Fei-Yue. Research on black-box attack algorithm by targeting ID card text recognition. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 103−120