基于低秩张量图学习的不完整多视角聚类

文杰; 颜珂; 张正; 徐勇

doi:10.16383/j.aas.c200519

基于低秩张量图学习的不完整多视角聚类

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c200519

文杰^1,,
颜珂^2,,
张正^{1, 3,},
徐勇^{1, 3,}

1.
哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)深圳市视觉目标检测与判识重点实验室深圳 518055
2.
北京理工大学计算机科学与技术学院北京 100080
3.
鹏城实验室深圳 518055

基金项目: 深圳市基础研究项目(JCYJ20190806142416685), 国家自然科学基金(62006059, 62002085), 中国博士后科学基金(2020M681099), 中国博士后创新人才支持计划(BX20190100), 深圳市科技创新委员会重点实验室组建项目(ZDSYS20190902093015527)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
文杰：哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)助理教授. 主要研究方向为机器学习和模式识别. 本文通信作者. E-mail: jiewen_pr@126.com

颜珂：北京理工大学博士后. 主要研究方向为生物信息学和模式识别. E-mail: yanke401@163.com

张正：哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)助理教授. 主要研究方向为机器学习, 计算机视觉和多媒体分析. E-mail: darrenzz219@gmail.com

徐勇：哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)教授. 主要研究方向为机器学习, 模式识别, 生物特征和视频分析. E-mail: yongxu@ymail.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 1918
- HTML全文浏览量: 1302
- PDF下载量: 262
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-09
- 修回日期: 2020-11-24
- 网络出版日期: 2021-03-27
- 刊出日期: 2023-07-20

Low-rank Tensor Graph Learning Based Incomplete Multi-view Clustering

WEN Jie^1
,,
YAN Ke^2
,,
ZHANG Zheng^{1, 3
,},
XU Yong^{1, 3
,}

1.
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Visual Object Detection and Recognition, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055
2.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100080
3.
Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055

Funds: Supported by Shenzhen Fundamental Research Fund (JCYJ20190806142416685), National Natural Science Foundation of China (62006059, 62002085), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681099), China Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20190100), and Establishment of Key Laboratory of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (ZDSYS20190902093015527)

More Information

Author Bio:
WEN Jie　Assistant professor at Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen). His research interest covers machine learning and pattern recognition. Corresponding author of this paper

YAN Ke　Postdoctor at Beijing Institute of Technology. His research interest covers bioinformatics and pattern recognition

ZHANG Zheng　Assistant professor at Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen). His research interest covers machine learning, computer vision, and multimedia analytics

XU Yong　Professor at Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen). His research interest covers machine learning, pattern recognition, biometrics, and video analysis

摘要

摘要: 传统多视角聚类都基于视角完备假设, 要求所有样本的视角信息完整, 不能处理存在部分视角缺失情形下的不完整多视角聚类任务. 为解决该问题, 提出一种基于低秩张量图学习的不完整多视角聚类方法. 为了恢复相似图中缺失视角所对应的样本关联信息, 该方法将低秩张量图约束和视角内在图保持约束融入到多视角谱聚类模型. 通过在一个统一模型中同时挖掘视角间的互补信息和视角内未缺失样例的关联信息, 所提出的方法能够得到表征样例邻接关系的完整相似图和视角间一致的最优聚类指示矩阵. 与12种不完整多视角聚类方法进行实验对比, 实验结果表明所提出的方法在多种视角缺失率下的5个数据集上获得了最好的聚类性能.
- 多视角聚类 /
- 视角缺失 /
- 不完整多视角聚类 /
- 图学习
Abstract: Conventional multi-view clustering methods all assume that the give multi-view data is complete, i.e., all views are fully observed, which are not applicable to the incomplete multi-view clustering case with missing-views. To address this issue, we propose a method, called low-rank tensor graph learning (LASAR). To recover the missing connections corresponding to the missing views in the graph space, the proposed method integrates the low-rank tensor graph constraint and intra-view graph constraint into the multi-view spectral clustering framework. By exploring the inter-view information and intra-view information with respect to the observed views simultaneously, the proposed method can obtain the optimal completed graphs of all views and the optimal clustering indicator matrix shared by all views. Experimental results on five datasets with different missing-view rates show that the proposed method obtains better performance than 12 state-of-the-art incomplete multi-view clustering methods.
- Multi-view clustering /
- view missing /
- incomplete multi-view clustering /
- graph learning
注释:

1) 1¹ 三阶以上的张量通常称之为高阶张量, 在高阶张量空间挖掘的信息称之为高阶信息^{[3, 22]}.

HTML全文

图 1 基于低秩张量图学习的不完整多视角聚类框图

Fig. 1 The flow chart of the low-rank tensor graph learning based incomplete multi-view clustering

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 多视角样本分布典型范例, 其中${\boldsymbol{S}}_{a,b}^{\left( v \right)}$表示a、b两样本的第$v$个视角特征的相似度

Fig. 2 Example of the distribution of multi-view samples, where ${\boldsymbol{S}}_{a,b}^{\left( v \right)}$ denotes the similarity degree of samples $a$ and $b$ in the $v$-th view

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 各方法在不同视角缺失率下的Handwritten、不同视角配对率下的Animal和不同视角配对率下的Reuters数据集上的聚类Purity (%)

Fig. 3 The clustering Purities (%) of different methods on Handwritten dataset with different missing-view rates, Animal dataset with different paired-view rates, and Reuters dataset with different paired-view rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 在视角缺失率为30%的Handwritten和Caltech7数据集上, 所提出LASAR方法的聚类NMI (%) 与超参数${\lambda _1}$和${\lambda _2}$的关系

Fig. 4 Clustering NMI (%) of the proposed LASAR v.s. hyper-parameters ${\lambda _1}$ and ${\lambda _2}$ on Handwritten and Caltech7 datasets with a missing-view rate of 30%

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 本文模型和其两种退化模型在视角缺失率或配对率均为30%的4个数据集上的聚类NMI和聚类ACC

Fig. 5 Clustering NMIs and ACCs of the proposed method and two degraded models on the four datasets with a missing-view rate or paired-view rate of 30%

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 在视角缺失率为30%的Handwritten和Caltech7数据集上, LASAR的目标函数值和聚类NMI (%)与迭代步数之间的关系

Fig. 6 Objective function value and clustering NMI (%) of LASAR v.s. the iterations on Handwritten and Caltech7 datasets with a missing-view rate of 30%

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 本文方法在视角缺失率为70%的Handwritten数据集上得到的第1个视角和第5个视角的相似图

Fig. 7 Two similarity graphs, corresponding to the 1st view and the 5th view, obtained by the proposed method on Handwritten dataset with a missing-view rate of 70%

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各方法在不同视角缺失率下的Caltech7和BBCSport数据集上的实验结果

Table 1 Experimental results of different methods on Caltech7 and BBCSport datasets with different missing-view rates

数据集	方法	NMI (%)			ACC (%)			Purity (%)
数据集	方法	0.1	0.3	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.5
Caltech7	MultiNMF+均值	30.16	28.52	28.88	46.39	40.61	37.92	79.80	78.43	78.03
	MultiNMF+KNN	36.38	34.27	34.19	50.71	43.98	42.66	80.68	80.88	80.17
	CCo_MVSC+零值	35.53	34.18	31.52	38.47	38.16	37.35	78.33	77.89	76.21
	CCo_MVSC+KNN	37.38	37.18	37.33	39.06	39.62	37.34	80.25	80.36	81.45
	MIC	33.71	27.35	20.44	44.07	38.01	35.80	78.12	73.31	68.26
	OMVC	28.13	25.32	18.76	40.88	36.82	33.28	79.21	77.73	74.05
	DAIMC	44.61	38.45	36.28	48.29	47.46	44.89	83.32	76.83	75.50
	OPIMC	42.98	41.54	35.98	49.24	48.34	44.12	84.89	83.70	80.64
	UEAF	39.44	31.07	24.02	50.82	42.71	36.32	81.49	78.26	76.29
	IMKKM-IK-MKC	24.09	23.45	22.91	36.54	34.87	36.05	72.98	73.82	72.52
	IMVSC_AGL	44.05	42.61	37.35	54.72	54.61	51.78	84.27	83.98	82.31
	GM-PMVC	60.26	52.35	47.95	62.65	54.95	47.65	91.26	84.49	83.93
	LASAR	66.08	62.80	52.76	70.29	69.02	66.46	92.76	90.27	84.84
BBCSport	MultiNMF+均值	23.48	18.25	14.79	48.58	42.75	40.34	47.17	44.66	43.10
	MultiNMF+KNN	33.41	29.17	32.66	56.03	54.14	54.66	58.62	55.51	58.27
	CCo_MVSC+零值	62.79	57.69	39.55	72.76	70.06	61.38	81.49	78.62	66.72
	CCo_MVSC+KNN	59.24	56.25	38.97	69.02	69.83	60.06	80.92	78.56	68.62
	MIC	29.90	25.84	24.01	51.21	46.21	46.03	55.00	51.72	52.41
	OMVC	30.64	41.57	40.63	53.33	51.38	48.79	56.49	59.20	57.47
	DAIMC	56.62	50.17	37.89	68.62	63.45	56.89	76.90	71.72	61.03
	OPIMC	35.66	31.56	21.75	54.14	52.93	45.69	58.28	56.72	50.86
	UEAF	70.71	68.25	55.13	78.22	77.24	69.31	87.41	87.07	77.07
	IMKKM-IK-MKC	72.91	64.42	53.52	77.55	75.66	67.07	88.76	84.03	77.00
	IMVSC_AGL	70.46	66.11	54.57	76.41	74.48	69.31	87.41	85.00	78.10
	GM-PMVC	70.34	66.26	48.93	74.66	73.48	60.07	85.17	84.48	72.68
	LASAR	77.09	70.30	57.04	85.00	77.41	73.28	90.00	88.62	78.79

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 各方法在不同视角缺失率下的Handwritten及不同视角配对率下的Animal和Reuters数据集上的实验结果

Table 2 Experimental results of different methods on Handwritten dataset with different missing-view rates, Animal and Reuters datasets with different paired-view rates

数据集	方法	NMI (%)				ACC (%)
数据集	方法	0.1	0.3	0.5	0.7	0.1	0.3	0.5	0.7
Handwritten	MultiNMF+均值	72.05	60.11	41.99	20.88	82.35	71.74	52.03	31.85
	MultiNMF+KNN	74.23	74.77	73.81	67.93	83.64	83.89	83.53	78.33
	CCo_MVSC+零值	70.90	68.23	62.86	53.14	74.61	73.17	70.15	64.62
	CCo_MVSC+KNN	73.03	73.77	73.06	67.66	76.76	76.79	76.20	75.52
	MIC	70.84	65.39	52.95	34.71	77.59	73.29	61.27	41.34
	OMVC	56.72	44.99	35.16	25.83	65.04	55.00	36.40	29.80
	DAIMC	79.78	76.65	68.77	47.10	88.86	86.73	81.92	60.44
	OPIMC	77.26	73.74	66.57	51.86	80.20	76.45	69.50	56.66
	UEAF	77.74	69.37	55.09	50.56	85.80	76.11	65.39	61.11
	IMKKM-IK-MKC	69.43	65.42	59.04	47.36	71.78	69.07	66.08	55.55
	IMVSC_AGL	93.68	90.55	86.39	75.44	97.15	95.50	93.19	84.08
	GM-PMVC	99.84	99.64	99.12	97.14	99.94	99.87	99.66	98.87
	LASAR	99.92	99.81	99.32	99.13	99.97	99.93	99.73	99.68
Animal	MultiNMF+均值	48.25	53.51	56.30	61.48	42.04	46.33	48.62	52.92
	MultiNMF+KNN	53.68	55.58	58.85	60.68	45.15	47.89	51.51	53.16
	CCo_MVSC+零值	52.19	55.31	58.31	61.71	48.12	52.03	54.72	56.73
	CCo_MVSC+KNN	49.13	57.96	61.37	63.86	47.71	53.58	56.79	58.41
	MIC	48.96	52.79	55.69	59.30	39.44	43.38	45.88	49.15
	OMVC	44.66	50.77	53.11	55.38	30.66	42.51	43.98	46.39
	DAIMC	49.33	55.03	59.36	62.76	42.76	50.18	53.87	56.42
	OPIMC	44.29	52.34	58.51	62.04	37.86	46.33	53.14	53.88
	UEAF	54.88	62.10	64.27	68.62	46.76	52.45	58.15	62.71
	IMKKM-IK-MKC	51.47	57.21	62.14	66.50	46.05	53.61	58.48	61.85
	IMVSC_AGL	56.38	59.65	63.26	66.71	51.61	54.94	57.97	60.73
	GM-PMVC	55.57	57.62	61.25	64.55	47.84	50.89	53.99	57.81
	LASAR	65.79	69.61	90.26	92.97	58.05	65.67	86.28	88.05
Reuters	MultiNMF+均值	19.58	18.82	18.56	19.51	37.68	38.31	37.27	37.58
	MultiNMF+KNN	19.91	23.17	22.50	22.21	37.95	38.08	37.47	37.35
	CCo_MVSC+零值	17.04	18.66	18.10	20.11	34.66	37.39	37.46	40.01
	CCo_MVSC+KNN	17.64	19.33	19.67	20.95	35.42	37.79	39.41	41.06
	MIC	18.72	21.30	22.78	24.34	38.47	40.85	41.37	43.05
	OMVC	18.05	19.77	21.37	22.97	36.78	37.44	39.45	41.09
	DAIMC	26.53	29.98	30.27	31.55	43.32	46.67	47.78	48.89
	OPIMC	19.02	22.47	23.82	25.39	40.58	42.19	43.87	44.43
	UEAF	24.77	26.85	27.14	28.36	41.45	44.95	46.87	47.92
	IMKKM-IK-MKC	24.30	26.75	26.88	28.67	41.13	45.71	46.40	47.29
	IMVSC_AGL	25.75	28.41	28.39	29.79	42.38	46.29	47.82	48.91
	GM-PMVC	26.22	29.35	30.71	30.89	43.15	46.88	48.19	50.44
	LASAR	28.34	32.01	31.27	32.77	45.38	48.14	50.80	52.77

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 各方法在5个数据集上的运行时间(s), 其中视角缺失率或配对率为30%

Table 3 Running time (s) of different methods on the above five datasets with a missing-view rate or paired-view rate of 30%

方法	Caltech7	BBCSport	Handwritten	Animal	Reuters	计算复杂度
MultiNMF+均值	60.38	28.62	35.54	13489.18	27385.81	${\rm{O} } \left( {\tau T\sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l { {m_v}cn} } \right)$^[10]
MultiNMF+KNN	59.05	25.46	40.69	13499.88	27408.45	${\rm{O} } \left( {\tau T\sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l { {m_v}cn} } \right)$^[10]
CCo_MVSC+零值	3.01	0.35	5.18	174.16	489.83	${\rm{O} } \left( {\tau \left( {l{n^3} + {n^3} } \right)} \right)$
CCo_MVSC+KNN	4.36	0.46	7.69	243.77	699.74	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {l{n^3} + {n^3}} \right)} \right)$
MIC	225.31	3.01	149.87	3693.92	22499.46	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau T\sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l {{m_v}cn} } \right)$^[10]
OMVC	152.54	3.17	27.77	3409.08	18154.71	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau T\sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l {{m_v}cn} } \right)$^[10]
DAIMC	62.74	81.18	26.72	2191.43	96628.66	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {Tnc{m_{\max }} + lm_{\max }^3} \right)} \right)$^[17]
OPIMC	0.16	0.05	0.09	3.31	1.05	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau lcn{m_{\max }}} \right)$^[18]
UEAF	4.64	2.36	7.05	1258.93	18599.64	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {2{n^3} + \sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l {{m_v}{c^2}} } \right)} \right)$^[19]
IMKKM-IK-MKC	23.68	0.22	41.22	975.38	1762.95	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {{n^3} + l{n^3} + {l^3}} \right)} \right)$^[21]
IMVSC_AGL	173.58	2.57	81.13	5265.99	28672.45	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {l{n^3} + {n^3} + \sum\nolimits_{v = 1}^l {n_v^3} } \right)} \right)$^[20]
GM-PMVC	607.40	14.63	602.81	50725.43	1.78×10⁵	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau l\left( {{n^3} + kdn + {k^3} + {k^2}d} \right)} \right)$^[22]
LASAR	73.87	1.09	115.60	2352.88	5677.46	${\rm{O}} \left( {\tau \left( {l{n^2}\log \left( n \right){\rm{ + }}{l^2}{n^2} + c{n^2}} \right)} \right)$
注: 本表未考虑K-means聚类算法的计算复杂度. 表中, T表示子循环迭代步数, m_max表示所有视角的最大特征维度, n_v表示第$v$个视角的未缺失样例数, d表示多视角数据特征的平均维度, k表示矩阵分解模型中的隐层表征维度.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)

[1]	Jain A K. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2010, 31(8): 651-666 doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011
[2]	Yang Y, Wang H. Multi-view clustering: A survey. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2018, 1(2): 83-107 doi: 10.26599/BDMA.2018.9020003
[3]	张长青. 基于自表达的多视角子空间聚类方法研究 [博士学位论文], 天津大学, 中国, 2015 Zhang Chang-Qing. Self-representation Based Multiview Subspace Clustering [Ph.D. dissertation], Tianjin University, China, 2015
[4]	Cai X, Nie F P, Huang H. Multi-view K-means clustering on big data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Beijing, China: AAAI Press, 2013. 2598−2604
[5]	张嘉旭, 王骏, 张春香, 林得富, 周塔, 王士同. 基于低秩约束的熵加权多视角模糊聚类算法. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(7): 1760-1770 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190350 Zhang Jia-Xu, Wang Jun, Zhang Chun-Xiang, Lin De-Fu, Zhou Ta, Wang Shi-Tong. Entropy-weighting multi-view fuzzy C-means with low rank constraint. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(7): 1760-1770 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190350
[6]	张祎, 孔祥维, 王振帆, 付海燕, 李明. 基于多视图矩阵分解的聚类分析. 自动化学报, 2018, 44(12): 2160-2169 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2018.c160636 Zhang Yi, Kong Xiang-Wei, Wang Zhen-Fan, Fu Hai-Yan, Li Ming. Matrix factorization for multi-view clustering. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 2160-2169 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2018.c160636
[7]	Zhan K, Nie F P, Wang J, Yang Y. Multiview consensus graph clustering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2019, 28(3): 1261-1270 doi: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2877335
[8]	Wen J, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Fei L K, Wang M. Generalized incomplete multiview clustering with flexible locality structure diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021, 51(1): 101-114 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2987164
[9]	杨旭, 朱振峰, 徐美香, 张幸幸. 多视角数据缺失补全. 软件学报, 2018, 29(4): 945-956 doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005416 Yang Xu, Zhu Zhen-Feng, Xu Mei-Xiang, Zhang Xing-Xing. Missing view completion for multi-view data. Journal of Software, 2018, 29(4): 945-956 doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005416
[10]	Shao W X, He L F, Lu C T, Yu P S. Online multi-view clustering with incomplete views. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). Washington, United States: IEEE, 2016. 1012−1017
[11]	Xu C, Guan Z Y, Zhao W, Wu H C, Niu Y F, Ling B L. Adversarial incomplete multi-view clustering. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Macao, China: AAAI Press, 2019. 3933−3939
[12]	Wen J, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Zhong Z F. Incomplete multi-view clustering via graph regularized matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshop. Munich, Germany: Springer, 2018. 593−608
[13]	Zhao H D, Liu H F, Fu Y. Incomplete multi-modal visual data grouping. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New York, United States: AAAI Press, 2016. 2392−2398
[14]	Li S Y, Jiang Y, Zhou Z H. Partial multi-view clustering. In: Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Québec City, Canada: AAAI Press, 2014. 1968−1974
[15]	Trivedi A, Rai P, Daumé H, DuVall S L. Multiview clustering with incomplete views. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Machine Learning for Social Computing, Hyatt Regency. Vancouver, Canada: MIT Press, 2010. 1−8
[16]	Shao W X, He L F, Yu P S. Multiple incomplete views clustering via weighted nonnegative matrix factorization with L_2,1 regularization. In: Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Porto, Portugal: Springer, 2015. 318−334
[17]	Hu M L, Chen S C. Doubly aligned incomplete multi-view clustering. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stockholm, Sweden: AAAI Press, 2018. 2262−2268
[18]	Hu M L, Chen S C. One-pass incomplete multi-view clustering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Honolulu, USA: AAAI Press, 2019. 3838−3845
[19]	Wen J, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Zhang B, Fei L K, Liu H. Unified embedding alignment with missing views inferring for incomplete multi-view clustering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Honolulu, USA: AAAI Press, 2019. Article No. 661
[20]	Wen J, Xu Y, Liu H. Incomplete multiview spectral clustering with adaptive graph learning. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2020, 50(4): 1418-1429 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2884715
[21]	Liu X, Zhu X, Li M, Wang L, Zhu E, Liu T, et al. Multiple kernel k-means with incomplete kernels. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020, 42(5): 1191-1204
[22]	赵博宇, 张长青, 陈蕾, 刘新旺, 李泽超, 胡清华. 生成式不完整多视图数据聚类. 自动化学报, 2021, 47(8): 1867-1875 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c200121 Zhao Bo-Yu, Zhang Chang-Qing, Chen Lei, Liu Xin-Wang, Li Ze-Chao, Hu Qing-Hua. Generative model for partial multi-view clustering. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1867-1875 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c200121
[23]	Wu J L, Lin Z C, Zha H B. Essential tensor learning for multi-view spectral clustering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2019, 28(12): 5910-5922 doi: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2916740
[24]	Nie F P, Wang X Q, Jordan M I, Huang H. The constrained Laplacian rank algorithm for graph-based clustering. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Phoenix, USA: AAAI Press, 2016. 1969−1976
[25]	Wright T G, Trefethen L N. Large-scale computation of pseudospectra using ARPACK and eigs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2001, 23(2): 591-605 doi: 10.1137/S106482750037322X
[26]	Wang H, Zong L L, Liu B, Yang Y, Zhou W. Spectral perturbation meets incomplete multi-view data. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Macao, China: AAAI Press, 2019. 3677−3683
[27]	Li F F, Fergus R, Perona P. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop. Washington, United States: IEEE, 2004. Article No. 178
[28]	Li Y Q, Nie F P, Huang H, Huang J Z. Large-scale multi-view spectral clustering via bipartite graph. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Austin, United States: AAAI Press, 2015. 2750−2756
[29]	Greene D, Cunningham P. Practical solutions to the problem of diagonal dominance in kernel document clustering. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. Pittsburgh, United States: ACM, 2006. 377−384
[30]	Duin, Robert. Multiple Features. UCI Machine Learning Repository. [Online], available: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5HC70, Match 2, 2021
[31]	Lampert C H, Nickisch H, Harmeling S. Learning to detect unseen object classes by between-class attribute transfer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miami, United States: IEEE, 2009. 951−958
[32]	Zhang C Q, Han Z B, Cui Y J, Fu H Z, Zhou J T, Hu Q H. CPM-nets: Cross partial multi-view networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, Canada: Curran Associates Inc, 2019. Article No. 51
[33]	Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe, United States: MIT Press, 2012. 1097−1105
[34]	Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations. San Diego, USA: 2014. 1−14
[35]	Amini M R, Usunier N, Goutte C. Learning from multiple partially observed views-an application to multilingual text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, Canada: Curran Associates Inc, 2009. 28−36
[36]	Liu J L, Wang C, Gao J, Han J W. Multi-view clustering via joint nonnegative matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 13th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Austin, United States: SIAM, 2013. 252−260
[37]	Kumar A, Rai P, Daumé H. Co-regularized multi-view spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Granada, Spain: Curran Associates Inc, 2011. 1413−1421
[38]	Bhadra S, Kaski S, Rousu J. Multi-view kernel completion. Machine Language, 2017, 106(5): 713-739
[39]	Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, Brown P, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(6): 520-525 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520