• 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于专家经验引导的浮选泡沫图像表征学习

张进 黄嘉豪 艾明曦 唐朝晖 谢永芳 马军

张进, 黄嘉豪, 艾明曦, 唐朝晖, 谢永芳, 马军. 基于专家经验引导的浮选泡沫图像表征学习. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250628
引用本文: 张进, 黄嘉豪, 艾明曦, 唐朝晖, 谢永芳, 马军. 基于专家经验引导的浮选泡沫图像表征学习. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250628
Zhang Jin, Huang Jia-Hao, Ai Ming-Xi, Tang Zhao-Hui, Xie Yong-Fang, Ma Jun. Expert experience informed froth image representation learning. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250628
Citation: Zhang Jin, Huang Jia-Hao, Ai Ming-Xi, Tang Zhao-Hui, Xie Yong-Fang, Ma Jun. Expert experience informed froth image representation learning. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250628

基于专家经验引导的浮选泡沫图像表征学习

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c250628 cstr: 32138.14.j.aas.c250628
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(62303201, 62303404, 62171476, 62233018), 云南省基础研究计划项目 (202401CF070111, 202401CF070171, 202301BE070001-049)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张进:昆明理工大学信息工程与自动化学院副教授. 2022 年获得中南大学控制科学与工程专业博士学位. 主要研究方向为深度学习, 数据高效建模. Email: j.zhang@kust.edu.cn

    黄嘉豪:昆明理工大学信息工程与自动化学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为基于机器视觉的复杂工业过程智能监测与优化. Email: jiahao_huang@stu.kust.edu.cn

    艾明曦:科学与工程专业博士学位. 主要研究方向为深度学习, 流程工业智能感知与建模. 本文通信作者 Email: mingxi_ai@ynu.edu.cn

    唐朝晖:中南大学自动化学院教授. 2008 年获得中南大学控制科学与工程专业博士学位. 主要研究方向为深度学习, 图像处理. Email: zhtang@csu.edu.cn

    谢永芳:中南大学自动化学院教授. 1999 年获得中南大学控制科学与工程专业博士学位. 主要研究方向为复杂工业过程建模、优化与控制. Email: yfxie@csu.edu.cn

    马军:昆明理工大学信息工程与自动化学院教授. 2016年获得昆明理工大学冶金工程控制专业博士学位. 主要研究方向为故障诊断. Email: mjun@kust.edu.cn

Expert Experience Informed Froth Image Representation Learning

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62303201, 62303404, 62171476, 62233018), and Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202401CF070111, 202401CF070171, 202301BE070001-049)
More Information
    Author Bio:

    ZHANG Jin Associate professor at the Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kun- ming University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from Central South University in 2022. His research interests include deep learning and data efficient modeling

    HUANG Jia-Hao A Master student at the Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology. His main research interest is intelligent monitoring and optimization of complex industrial processes based on machine vision

    AI Ming-Xi Lecture at the School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University. She received her Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from Central South University in 2022. Her research interests include deep learning, intelligent perception and modeling in industrial processes. Corresponding author of this paper

    TANG Zhao-Hui Professor at the School of Automation, Central South University. He received his Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from Central South University in 2008. His main research interests include deep learning and image processing

    XIE Yong-Fang Professor at the School of Automation, Central South University. He received his Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from Central South University in 1999. His research interests include modeling, optimization and control of complicated industrial processes

    MA Jun Professor at the Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in metallurgical engineering control from Kunming University of Science and Technology in 2016. His research interest is fault diagnosis

  • 摘要: 矿浆品位等关键指标难以通过传感器在线直接测量, 研究利用易获取的过程运行数据与泡沫图像间接估计矿浆品位的软测量方法具有重要工程意义. 针对传统泡沫图像表征方法表征能力不足且泛化性差的问题, 提出专家经验引导的泡沫图像表征学习方法. 该方法由分布特征隔离与经验引导表征两部分构成: 前者将泡沫图像映射至尺寸、颜色、纹理等具有明确工艺解释意义的视觉属性子空间, 以及用于补充隐性判别信息的数据特征子空间, 实现结构化的视觉属性表征; 后者通过构造模拟人工视觉判断过程的对比学习机制, 引导模型在各子空间中学习与专家经验一致的判别特征, 建立视觉属性子空间与专家知识之间的显式对应关系. 基于中国某铅锌选厂的工业数据实验结果表明, 所提方法在锌、铅、铁底流品位软测量中的决定系数较近期提出的软测量模型DEFIE分别提升 3.97%、1.97%和 2.40%, 预测区间覆盖率提升15.00%.
  • 图  1  基于专家经验引导的泡沫图像表征学习框图, 包括分布特征隔离网络与经验引导表征学习机制

    Fig.  1  Framework of EI-FRIL, which consists of distributed feature isolation network and experience informed representation learning mechanism

    图  2  经验引导表征学习示例 ((a) ~ (c)分别对应尺寸、颜色、纹理特异性学习示例)

    Fig.  2  Illustrative examples for experience informed representation learning ((a) ~ (c) are the learning instances corresponding to size, color, and texture, respectively)

    图  3  铅锌浮选槽及数据采集

    Fig.  3  Lead-zinc flotation bank and data collection

    图  4  浮选监测模型对比实验结果残差图及散点图

    Fig.  4  Comparison experiment results of flotation monitoring models shown by scatter plots and residual plots

    图  5  浮选监测模型预测不确定性度量

    Fig.  5  Prediction uncertainty evaluation of flotation monitoring models

    图  6  浮选监测模型可解释方差得分度量

    Fig.  6  Explained variance score evaluation of flotation monitoring models

    图  7  知识嵌入模型对比实验结果残差图及散点图

    Fig.  7  Comparison experiment results of knowledge embedding models shown by scatter plots and residual plots

    图  8  知识嵌入模型预测不确定性度量

    Fig.  8  Prediction uncertainty evaluation of knowledge embedding models

    图  9  知识嵌入模型可解释方差得分度量

    Fig.  9  Explained variance score evaluation of knowledge embedding models

    图  10  锑浮选五类典型工况图像示例 ((a) ~ (e)对应低品位、偏低品位、适中品位、偏高品位、高品位工况)

    Fig.  10  Froth images captured from five different working conditions ((a) ~ (e) correspond to low grade, slightly low-grade, medium-grade, slightly high-grade, and high-grade conditions, respectively)

    表  1  浮选监测模型对比量化实验结果

    Table  1  Quantitative comparison experiment results of flotation monitoring models

    方法 成分 参数(M) FLOPs(G) 指标
    MAE RMSE R2
    TCN[37] Zn 20.2 3.5 0.2876 0.4394 0.8103
    Pb 0.2856 0.3969 0.8401
    Fe 0.2421 0.3706 0.8621
    MSFE[22] Zn 24.5 5.8 0.2415 0.4117 0.8335
    Pb 0.2704 0.3773 0.8555
    Fe 0.2365 0.3586 0.8709
    RLN[38] Zn 24.0 7.7 0.2535 0.4029 0.8366
    Pb 0.2686 0.3702 0.8609
    Fe 0.2149 0.3052 0.9605
    ViT[39] Zn 86.8 17.6 0.2716 0.4233 0.8240
    Pb 0.2756 0.3728 0.8589
    Fe 0.1991 0.2694 0.9202
    DEFIE[4] Zn 27.8 8.3 0.2349 0.3909 0.8499
    Pb 0.2489 0.3558 0.8720
    Fe 0.1842 0.2721 0.9257
    EI-FIRL Zn 35.9 14.8 0.2156 0.3488 0.8836
    Pb 0.2394 0.3338 0.8892
    Fe 0.1658 0.2281 0.9479
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  知识嵌入模型对比量化实验结果

    Table  2  Quantitative experiment results of knowledge embedding models

    方法 成分 指标
    MAE RMSE R2
    ConcFus[24] Zn 0.2638 0.3934 0.8507
    Pb 0.2893 0.3881 0.8477
    Fe 0.2287 0.3281 0.8922
    PriKnoInfo[30] Zn 0.2442 0.3830 0.8585
    Pb 0.2595 0.3540 0.8733
    Fe 0.2156 0.3146 0.9009
    PriKnoDisti[13] Zn 0.2291 0.3772 0.8643
    Pb 0.2406 0.3310 0.8826
    Fe 0.2007 0.2530 0.9366
    EI-FIRL Zn 0.2156 0.3488 0.8836
    Pb 0.2394 0.3338 0.8892
    Fe 0.1658 0.2281 0.9479
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  消融实验量化结果

    Table  3  Quantitative results of ablation study

    设置成分指标
    MAERMSER2
    变体1Zn0.22640.36790.8684
    Pb0.24450.33690.8839
    Fe0.19850.26400.9388
    变体2Zn0.24990.39170.8520
    Pb0.26060.36660.8641
    Fe0.19880.26850.9334
    变体3Zn0.22450.36000.8720
    Pb0.24120.33450.8842
    Fe0.19030.24770.9400
    变体4Zn0.22340.35610.8776
    Pb0.23870.33360.8875
    Fe0.17310.24040.9421
    变体5Zn0.21980.36270.8731
    Pb0.24450.33690.8839
    Fe0.18750.24730.9401
    EI-FIRLZn0.21560.34880.8836
    Pb0.23940.33380.8892
    Fe0.16580.22810.9479
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  锑浮选工况分类验证实验

    Table  4  Antimony working condition recognition validation experiments

    方法 指标(%)
    Accuracy Precision Recall F1
    TCN[37] 81.28 81.73 81.50 81.31
    MSFE[22] 83.07 83.46 83.41 83.09
    RLN[38] 84.07 84.40 84.30 84.05
    ViT[39] 82.18 82.53 82.38 82.15
    DEFIE[4] 85.31 85.28 85.75 85.17
    ConcFus[24] 85.18 85.22 85.57 85.11
    PriKnoInfo[30] 85.40 85.75 85.67 85.45
    PriKnoDisti[13] 86.14 86.28 86.65 86.12
    EI-FIRL 89.41 89.71 89.48 89.36
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Chen Qing, Ai Mingxi, Gui Weihua. Timed key-value memory network for flotation reagent control. Control Engineering Practice, 2020, 98: 104360. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104360
    [2] Ai Mingxi, Xie Yongfang, Tang Zhaohui, Wu Jiande, Li Peng, Zhang Jin. Self-supervised dynamic and static feature representation learning method for flotation monitoring. Powder Technology, 2024, 442: 119866. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2024.119866
    [3] 刘金平, 何捷舟, 唐朝晖, 谢永芳, 马天雨. 基于WCGAN的矿物浮选泡沫图像光照不变颜色提取. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(9): 2301−2315. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190330

    Liu Jin-Ping, He Jie-Zhou, Tang Zhao-Hui, Xie Yong-Fang, Ma Tian-Yu. WCGAN-based illumination-invariant color measuring of mineral flotation froth images. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2301−2315 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190330
    [4] Zhang Jin, Ai Mingxi, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Wu Jiande, Ma Jun. Data-efficient soft sensing learning for flotation process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025, 74: 5037810. doi: 10.1109/tim.2025.3580794
    [5] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Ai Mingxi, Gui Weihua. Convolutional memory network-based flotation performance monitoring. Minerals Engineering, 2020, 151: 106332. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106332
    [6] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Ai Mingxi, Gui Weihua. Nonlinear modeling of the relationship between reagent dosage and flotation froth surface image by Hammerstein-Wiener model. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 120: 19−28. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.018
    [7] 崔琳琳, 沈冰冰, 葛志强. 基于混合变分自编码器回归模型的软测量建模方法. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(2): 398−407. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c210035

    Cui Lin-Lin, Shen Bing-Bing, Ge Zhi-Qiang. A mixture variational autoencoder regression model for soft sensor application. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 398−407 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c210035
    [8] Zhang Jin, Ai Mingxi, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Ma Jun, Wu Jiande. A sentinel-based adaptive hybrid soft sensor for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025, 74: 5025813.
    [9] Ai Mingxi, Zhang Jin, Li Peng, Wu Jiande, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang. Semi-supervised contrastive learning for flotation process monitoring with uncertainty-aware prototype optimi- zation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 145: 110222. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110222
    [10] Aldrich Chris, Avelar Erica, Liu Xiu. Recent advances in flotation froth image analysis. Minerals Engineering, 2022, 188: 107823. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107823
    [11] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Ai Mingxi, Zhang Guoyong, Gui Weihua. Data-driven adaptive modeling method for industrial processes and its application in flotation reagent control. ISA Transactions, 2021, 108: 305−316. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.024
    [12] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Ai Mingxi, Gui Weihua. Generative adversarial network-based image-level optimal setpoint calculation for flotation reagents control. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 197: 116790. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116790
    [13] Ai Mingxi, Xie Yongfang, Ding Steven X. , Tang Zhaohui, Gui Weihua. Domain knowledge distillation and supervised contrastive learning for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2023, 70: 9452−9462. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3206696
    [14] Gao Xiaoliang, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Zhang Hu, Gui Weihua. A layered working condition perception integrating handcrafted with deep features for froth flotation. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 170: 107059. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107059
    [15] Sadr-Kazemi N, Cilliers J J. An image processing algorithm for measurement of flotation froth bubble size and shape distributions. Minerals Engineering, 1997, 10(10): 1075−83. doi: 10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00094-0
    [16] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Liu Jinping, Tan Zhen, Xu Pengfei. Recognition of flotation working conditions through froth image statistical modeling for performance monitoring. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 86: 116−29. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.12.008
    [17] Zhang Jin, Tang Zhaohui, Xie Yongfang, Ai Mingxi, Gui Weihua. Visual perception-based fault diagnosis in froth flotation using statistical approaches. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2021, 26(2): 172−184. doi: 10.26599/TST.2019.9010071
    [18] Liu Jinping, He Jiezhou, Xie Yongfang, Gui Weihua, Tang Zhaohui, Ma Tianyu. Illumination-invariant flotation froth color measuring via Wasserstein distance-based CycleGAN with structure-preserving constraint. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021, 51(2): 839−852. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2977537
    [19] Gharehchobogh Behzad Karkari, Kuzekanani Ziaddin Daie, Sobhi Jafar, Khiavi Abdolhamid Moallemi. Flotation froth image segmentation using mask R-CNN. Minerals Engineering, 2023, 192: 107959. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107959
    [20] Fan Yuhan, Lv Ziqi, Wang Weidong, Tian Rui, Zhang Kanghui, Wang Mengchen, et al. A density map regression method and its application in the coal flotation froth image analysis. Measurement, 2022, 205: 112212. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112212
    [21] Zarie M. , Jahedsaravani A. , Massinaei M. Flotation froth image classification using convolutional neural networks. Minerals Engineering, 2020, 155: 106443.
    [22] Tang Zhaohui, Zhang Jin, Xie Yongfang, Ding Steven X. , Ai Mingxi. Semi-supervised contrastive memory network for industrial process working condition monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 5025110.
    [23] Rueden L. Von, Mayer S. , Beckh K. , Georgiev B. , Giesselbach S. , Heese R. Informed machine learning – A taxonomy and survey of integrating prior knowledge into learning systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(1): 614−33.
    [24] Li Y. , Xie S. , Wang J. , Zhang J. , Yan H. Sparse Sample Train Axle Bearing Fault Diagnosis: A semi-supervised model based on prior knowledge embedding. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 1−11.
    [25] Deng X. , Feng S. , Lyu G. , Wang T. , Lang C. Beyond word embeddings: Heterogeneous prior knowledge driven multi-label image classification. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023, 25: 4013−4025.
    [26] Chen Z. , Xu J. , Peng T. , Yang C. Graph convolutional network-based method for fault diagnosis using a hybrid of measurement and prior knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2022, 52(9): 9157−9169.
    [27] Lu D. , Wang F. , Liu Y. , Wang S. , Li K. Process operating performance assessment for plant-wide froth flotation via distributed multigraph deep embedding graph clustering network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: 1−10.
    [28] Sun Bei, Yang Wei, He Mingfang, Wang Xiaoli. An integrated multi-mode model of froth flotation cell based on fusion of flotation kinetics and froth image features. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 172: 107169. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107169
    [29] Qiao W. , Liu X. , Huang J. , Wu G. A prior knowledge embedding contrastive attention learning network for variable working conditions bearing fault diagnosis with small samples. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24(23): 39967−80.
    [30] Lu Feiyu, Tong Qingbin, Jiang Xuedong, Du Xin, Xu Jianjun, Huo Jingyi. Prior knowledge embedding convolutional autoencoder: A single-source domain generalized fault diagnosis framework under small samples. Computers in Industry, 2025, 164: 104169. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2024.104169
    [31] Zhang Tianci, Chen Jinglong, Ye Zhisheng, Liu Wenting, Tang Jinyuan. Prior knowledge-informed multi-task dynamic learning for few-shot machinery fault diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 271: 126439. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126439
    [32] Zhang T. , Chen J. , He S. , Zhou Z. Prior knowledge-augmented self-supervised feature learning for few-shot intelligent fault diagnosis of machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(10): 10573−10584.
    [33] Chen Shi-Zhi, Zhang Shu-Ying, Feng De-Cheng, Taciroglu Ertugrul. Embedding prior knowledge into data-driven structural performance prediction to extrapolate from training domains. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 149(12): 04023099. doi: 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7062
    [34] Hong Yuxiang, Lin Kai, Xu Jing, Chang Baohua, Du Dong. Expert knowledge-guided deep neural network based on context-aware hierarchy for foils joining quality monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2026, 69: 104001. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.104001
    [35] Jiang Z. , Guo Y. , Pan D. , Gui W. , Maldague X. Polymorphic measurement method of FeO content of sinter based on heterogeneous features of infrared thermal images. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21(10): 12036−12047.
    [36] 潘冬, 许川, 龚芃旭, 蒋朝辉, 桂卫华. 基于红外与可见光视觉的高炉铁口铁水温度场在线检测. 自动化学报, 2025, 51(2): 343.

    Pan Dong, Xu Chuan, Gong Peng-Xu, Jiang Zhao-Hui, Gui Wei-Hua. Online measurement of molten iron temperature field at blast furnace taphole based on infrared and visible vision. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2025, 51(2): 343−355
    [37] Wang Xu, Zhou Junwu, Wang Qingkai, Liu Daoxi, Lian Jingmin. An unsupervised method for extracting semantic features of flotation froth images. Minerals Engineering, 2022, 176: 107344. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107344
    [38] Ma Boyan, Du Yangyi, Zhou Xiaojun, Yang Chunhua. A novel adaptive optimization method for deep learning with application to froth floatation monitoring. Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53(10): 11820−11832. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-04083-1
    [39] Peng C. , Liu Y. , Ouyang Y. , Tang Z. , Luo L. , Gui W. Grade prediction of froth flotation based on multistep fusion transformer model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2024, 20(4): 6030−40.
    [40] Ai Mingxi, Xie Yongfang, Xie Shiwen, Li Fanbiao, Gui Weihua. Data-driven-based adaptive fuzzy neural network control for the antimony flotation plant. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2019, 356(12): 5944−60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.04.032
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-11-13
  • 录用日期:  2026-01-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-03-04

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回