-
摘要: 针对浮选精煤泡沫分割中因低质图像数据导致的目标漏检及误分割问题, 提出一种基于密度感知引导的煤泥浮选泡沫分割方法. 首先, 构建跨尺度区域密度感知模块, 设计层次化密度估计子模块提取多尺度差异化区域密度信息, 并提出基于全局语义引导的跨尺度聚合方式, 融合生成具有区域差异感知能力的密度引导表征. 其次, 设计基于密度引导的分支增强模块, 建立基于分布感知的动态密度注意力机制, 构成以密度分布为先验、动态调节双分支空间特征响应的增强策略, 降低泡沫漏检率. 最后, 设计基于密度引导的互信息约束优化模块, 提出以互信息最大化为目标的语义耦合策略, 形成强化密度与分割表征间统计依赖的联合优化方法, 提升泡沫边界的分割判别能力. 在两个实际浮选泡沫数据集上的实验结果表明, 所提方法有效提升了泡沫分割性能.Abstract: To address the challenges of missed detection and mis-segmentation of targets in clean coal flotation foam segmentation caused by low-quality image data, this paper proposes a coal flotation foam segmentation method with density-aware guidance. First, a cross-scale regional density perception module is constructed, in which a hierarchical density estimation submodule is designed to extract multi-scale differential regional density information. Furthermore, a global semantic-guided cross-scale aggregation approach is proposed to integrate and generate density-guided representation with regional difference awareness capability. Second, a density-guided branch enhancement module is designed, in which a distribution-aware dynamic density attention mechanism is established to construct an enhancement strategy that uses density distribution as a prior to dynamically regulate the spatial feature responses of dual branches, thereby reducing the missed detection rate of foam. Finally, a density-guided mutual information constraint optimization module is designed, introducing a semantic coupling strategy based on mutual information maximization to jointly optimize and strengthen the statistical dependence between density and segmentation representation, improving the discriminative ability of foam boundary segmentation. Experimental results on two real flotation foam datasets demonstrate that the proposed method effectively improves foam segmentation performance.
-
表 1 各模块消融实验验证结果(%)
Table 1 Ablation experiment verification results of each module (%)
基线 MA MB MC Froth-Plant1 Froth-Plant2 AP mIoU AP mIoU √ — — — 63.27 50.36 73.36 57.20 √ √ — — 65.14 51.94 74.49 57.58 √ √ √ — 67.84 52.32 75.88 58.03 √ √ — √ 66.52 53.55 75.01 58.62 √ √ √ √ 68.27 53.78 76.15 58.84 表 2 与主流方法的对比实验结果
Table 2 Comparative experimental results with mainstream methods
方法类别 方法名称 Froth-Plant1 Froth-Plant2 AP (%) mIoU (%) FPS AP (%) mIoU (%) FPS 两阶段 Mask R-CNN[25] 69.30 49.48 10.6 75.70 56.66 11.3 Cascade Mask R-CNN[26] 68.90 50.11 7.1 78.20 58.65 7.9 Hybrid Task Cascade[27] 69.40 50.92 5.2 77.30 54.65 5.7 Mask DINO[28] 67.61 53.36 10.7 72.84 54.96 12.1 Contourformer[29] 68.85 44.15 15.3 73.27 39.07 16.5 Grounded SAM[34] 56.55 53.12 0.1 68.71 54.80 0.2 单阶段 EmbedMask[30] 61.30 45.67 18.2 75.10 51.99 19.4 BoxInst[36] 64.70 45.17 15.6 71.30 55.71 16.7 SOLO[37] 66.30 48.96 18.7 72.40 52.08 19.5 SparseInst[38] 65.90 52.27 20.5 74.20 57.82 20.7 SimCIS[32] 61.12 51.90 19.0 73.30 56.18 20.3 FastSAM[33] 69.18 52.39 22.3 73.26 57.12 23.6 YOLACT[31] 63.27 50.36 24.9 73.36 57.20 25.6 本文方法 68.27 53.78 23.6 76.15 58.84 24.3 表 3 泛化性验证实验结果(%)
Table 3 Results of generalization validation experiments(%)
数据集 AP mIoU PanNuke 73.88 63.33 bubble_size_distribution 64.76 47.77 BubbleBench 64.01 51.96 -
[1] Polat M, Polat H, Chander S. Physical and chemical interactions in coal flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 199−213 doi: 10.1016/s0301-7516(03)00099-1 [2] 王红艳, 孙卓琪, 王兰豪, 南静, 代伟. 基于多源信息融合的浮选精煤灰分智能检测方法. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(12): 280−292 doi: 10.12438/cst.2025-0723Wang Hong-Yan, Sun Zhuo-Qi, Wang Lan-Hao, Nan Jing, Dai Wei. Intelligent detection method for flotation clean coal ash based on multi-source information fusion. Coal Science and Technology, 2025, 53(12): 280−292 doi: 10.12438/cst.2025-0723 [3] Han N, Li Y F, Zhang Z Y, Gong J B, Zhang B L, Li Y F. A Bayesian optimization stacked ensemble learning method: Predicting ash content in flotation cleaned coal using X-ray fluorescence oxides data. Minerals Engineering, 2026, 242: Article No. 110227 doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110227 [4] Lu F C, Liu H Z, Lv W B. Deep correlation and precise prediction between static features of froth images and clean coal ash content in coal flotation: An investigation based on deep learning and maximum likelihood estimation. Measurement, 2024, 224: Article No. 113843 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113843 [5] Yang T, Zhang Z Y, Chen P, Gui D J, Li Y F. Study on the prediction of cleaning coal ash content based on principal component analysis and machine learning. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 20251−17 [6] 赵洪伟, 谢永芳, 蒋朝辉, 徐德刚, 阳春华, 桂卫华. 基于泡沫图像特征的浮选槽液位智能优化设定方法. 自动化学报, 2014, 40(6): 1086−1097Zhao Hong-Wei, Xie Yong-Fang, Jang Zhao-Hui, Xu De-Gang, Yang Chun-Hua, Gui Wei-Hua. An intelligent optimal setting approach based on froth features for level of flotation cells. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2014, 40(6): 1086−1097 [7] Massinaei M, Jahedsaravani A, Taheri E, Khalilpour J. Machine vision based monitoring and analysis of a coal column flotation circuit. Powder Technology, 2019, 343: 330−341 doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.056 [8] Tan J K, Liang L, Peng Y L, Xie G Y. Correction of froth gray value in the prediction of clean coal ash content in coal flotation. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 2022, 42(9): 2742−2755 doi: 10.1080/19392699.2021.1900135 [9] 汪海洋, 潘德炉, 夏德深. 二维Otsu自适应阈值选取算法的快速实现. 自动化学报, 2007(9): 968−971Wang Hai-Yang, Pan De-Lu, Xia De-Shen. A fast algorithm for two-dimensional Otsu adaptive threshold algorithm. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2007(9): 968−971 [10] Brar K, Goyal B, Dogra A, Mustafa M, Majumdar R, Alkhayyat A, et al. Image segmentation review: Theoretical background and recent advances. Information Fusion, 2025, 114: Article No. 102608 doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102608 [11] 桂卫华, 阳春华, 徐德刚, 卢明, 谢永芳. 基于机器视觉的矿物浮选过程监控技术研究进展. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(11): 1879−1888Gui Wei-Hua, Yang Chun-Hua, Xu De-Gang, Lu Ming, Xie Yong-Fang. Machine-vision-based online measuring and controlling technologies for mineral flotation: A review. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(11): 1879−1888 [12] Minaee S, Boykov Y, Porikli F, Plaza A, Kehtarnavaz N, Terzopoulos D. Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021, 44(7): 3523−3542 [13] 路迈西, 王勇, 王凡, 刘文礼. 利用阈值分割技术提取煤泥浮选泡沫图像的物理特征. 煤炭科学技术, 2002(8): 34−37Lu Mai-Xi, Wang Yong, Wang Fan, Liu Wen-Li. Threshold segmentation technology applied to get physical features of foam image from slime floatation. Coal Science and Technology, 2002(8): 34−37 [14] Shilov R E, Logunova O S, Lednov A V. Methods and algorithms for segmentation of the image in control flotation process. In: Proceedings of the International Russian Automation Conference. Sochi, Russia: IEEE, 2018. 1–4 [15] Jahedsaravani A, Massinaei M, Marhaban M H. An image segmentation algorithm for measurement of flotation froth bubble size distributions. Measurement, 2017, 111: 29−37 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.023 [16] Jia R D, Ren M X, Lang D, Zheng J, He D K, Yu F. A semantic segmentation-based algorithm for fast flotation bubble size distribution measurement. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2024, 208: 795−807 doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2024.07.041 [17] Zeng T, Wu B, Ji S W. DeepEM3D: Approaching human-level performance on 3D anisotropic EM image segmentation. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(16): 2555−2562 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx188 [18] 罗会兰, 黎宵. 基于上下文和浅层空间编解码网络的图像语义分割方法. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(7): 1834−1846Luo Hui-Lan, Li Xiao. Image semantic segmentation method based on context and shallow space encoder-decoder network. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(7): 1834−1846 [19] Yu C Q, Wang J B, Peng C, Gao C X, Yu G, Sang N. Bisenet: Bilateral segmentation network for real-time semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Munich, Germany: Springer, 2018. 334–349 [20] Strudel R, Garcia R, Laptev I, Schmid C. Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Montreal, Canada: IEEE, 2021. 7242–7252 [21] Wan Z F, Zhang P P, Wang Y H, Yong S L, Stepputtis S, Sycara K, et al. Sigma: Siamese mamba network for multi-modal semantic segmentation. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. Waikoloa, USA: IEEE, 2025. 1734–1744 [22] Xu Z Z, Wu D Y, Yu C Q, Chu X X, Sang N, Gao C X. Sctnet: Single-branch CNN with Transformer semantic information for real-time segmentation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, Canada: AAAI Press, 2024. 38(6): 6378–6386 [23] Wu R K, Liu Y H, Ning G C, Liang P C, Chang Q. UltraLight VM-UNET: Parallel vision mamba significantly reduces parameters for skin lesion segmentation. Patterns, 2025, 6(11): Article No. 101298 doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101298 [24] Fu Y X, Lou M, Yu Y Z. SegMAN: Omni-scale context modeling with state space models and local attention for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Nashville, USA: IEEE, 2025. 19077–19087 [25] He K M, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Girshick R. Mask R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice, Italy: IEEE, 2017. 2961–2969 [26] Cai Z, Vasconcelos N. Cascade R-CNN: High quality object detection and instance segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, 43(5): 1483−1498 [27] Chen K, Pang J M, Wang J Q, Xiong Y, Li X X, Sun S Y, et al. Hybrid task cascade for instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach, CA, USA: IEEE, 2019. 4974–4983 [28] Li F, Zhang H, Xu H Z, Liu S L, Zhang L, Ni L M, et al. Mask DINO: Towards a unified Transformer-based framework for object detection and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE, 2023. 3041–3050 [29] Yao W W, Li C, Xiong M J, Dong W B, Chen H, Xiao X. ContourFormer: Real-time contour-based end-to-end instance segmentation transformer. In: 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Rome, Italy: IEEE, 2025. 1–8 [30] Ying H, Huang Z J, Liu S, Shao T J, Zhou K. EmbedMask: Embedding coupling for one-stage instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal, Canada: IJCAI, 2021. 1266–1273 [31] Bolya D, Zhou C, Xiao F Y, Lee Y J. YOLACT: Real-time instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Seoul, Republic of Korea: IEEE, 2019. 9157–9166 [32] Zhu Y C, Shi C, Wang D Y, Tang J J, Wei Z X, Wu Y, et al. Rethinking query-based transformer for continual image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Nashville, USA: IEEE, 2025. 4595–4606 [33] Zhao X, Ding W C, An Y Q, Du Y L, Yu T, Li M, et al. Fast segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.12156, 2023. [34] Ren T H, Liu S L, Zeng A L, Lin J, Li K C, Cao H, et al. Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2401.14159, 2024. [35] 曹斌芳, 谢永芳, 阳春华, 桂卫华, 王晓丽. 基于多源数据的铝土矿浮选生产指标集成建模方法. 控制理论与应用, 2014, 31(9): 1252−1261Cao Bin-Fang, Xie Yong-Fang, Yang Chun-Hua, Wang Xiao-Li. Integrated modeling for production index of bauxite flotation based on multi-source data. Control Theory & Applications, 2014, 31(9): 1252−1261 [36] Tian Z, Shen C H, Wang X L, Chen H. BoxInst: High-performance instance segmentation with box annotations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Virtual Event: IEEE, 2021. 5443–5452 [37] Wang X L, Kong T, Shen C H, Jiang Y N, Li L. SOLO: Segmenting objects by locations. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Glasgow, UK: Springer, 2020. 649–665 [38] Cheng T H, Wang X G, Chen S Y, Zhang W Q, Zhang Q, Huang C, Zhang Z X, Liu W Y. Sparse instance activation for real-time instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New Orleans, USA: IEEE, 2022. 4433–4442 -
计量
- 文章访问数: 18
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
下载: