Causal Relation Extraction of Uyghur Emergency Events Based on Cascaded Model
-
摘要: 针对传统事件因果关系识别覆盖范围小和人工标注代价高等不足,提出了一种基于双层模型的维吾尔语突发事件因果关系抽取方法. 该方法采用分治思想,将因果关系抽取问题转化为对事件序列的两次模式识别标注. 采用Bootstrapping算法,在第一次模式识别时,标注因果关系的语义角色,并将标注的语义角色标签作为新的特征传递给第二层模式识别,用于因果关系边界标注. 该方法用于维吾尔语突发事件显式因果关系的抽取准确率为85.39%,召回率为77.53%,证明了本文提出的方法在维吾尔语主题突发事件因果关系抽取上的有效性和实用性.
-
关键词:
- 因果关系 /
- 维吾尔语 /
- 突发事件 /
- Bootstrapping /
- 模式软匹配
Abstract: Because the traditional events causal relation has the disadvantages of small recognition coverage and the labeling cost is high, a method for causal relation extraction of Uyghur emergency events is presented based on cascaded model. Utilizing the divide-and-conquer strategy, it converts the problem of causal relation extraction to two pattern recognition labeling of event sequence. By applying the bootstrapping algorithm, the method labels the semantic role of causal relation in the first layer of pattern recognition, then utilizes the semantic role label as a new feature and transfers it to the second layer of pattern recognition for labeling causal relation boundary. This method has been used in the explicit causal relation extraction of Uyghur emergency events, and the results have shown that the precision rate and the recall rate can reach 85.39% and 77.53%, indicating the efficiency and practicability of the method of causal relation extraction of Uyghur topic emergency events.-
Key words:
- Causal relation /
- Uyghur /
- emergency events /
- bootstrapping /
- pattern soft matching
-
[1] Ji Lei, Chi Hong, Chen An. Emergency Management. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006 (计雷, 池红, 陈安. 突发事件应急管理. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006) [2] Puente C, Sobrino A, José A, Olivas, Merlo R. Extraction, analysis and representation of imperfect conditional and causal sentences by means of a semi-automatic process. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy System. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2010, 1-8 [3] Pechsiri C, Kawtrakul A. Mining causality from texts for question answering system. IEICE-Transactions on Information and Systems, 2007, E90-D(10): 1523-1533 [4] Lee S M, Shin J A. Definition and extraction of causal relations for QA on fault diagnosis of devices. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. Dayton, USA: IEEE, 2008. 82-85 [5] Ittoo A, Bouma G. Extracting explicit and implicit causal relations from sparse, domain-specific texts. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011. 52-63 [6] Girju R, Moldovan D. Text mining for causal relations. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. Florida, USA: AAAI Press, 2002. 360-364 [7] Kaplan R M, Berry-Rogghe G. Knowledge-based acquisition of causal relationships in text. Knowledge Acquisition, 1991, 3(3): 317-337 [8] Khoo C S G, Kornfilt J, Myaeng S H, Oddy R N. Automatic extraction of cause-effect information from newspaper text without knowledge-based inferencing. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 1998, 13(4): 177-186 [9] Gan Hong-Hua, Pan Yun-He. A new analysis of the structure of event causation. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 16(1): 56-62 (干红华, 潘云鹤. 一种基于事件的因果关系的结构分析方法. 模式识别与人工智能, 2003, 16(1): 56-62) [10] Girju R. Automatic detection of causal relations for question answering. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACL Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering. Sapporo, Japan: ACL, 2003. 76-83 [11] Marcu D, Echihabi A. An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Philadelphia, USA: ACL, 2002. 368-375 [12] Inui T, Inui K, Matsumoto Y. What kinds and amounts of causal knowledge can be acquired from text by using connective markers as clues? Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2003, 2843: 180-193 [13] Blanco E, Castell N, Moldovan D. Causal relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marrakech, Morocco, 2008. 310-313 [14] Fu Jian-Feng, Liu Zong-Tian, Liu Wei, Zhou Wen. Event causal relation extraction based on cascaded conditional random fields. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 24(4): 567-573 (付剑锋, 刘宗田, 刘炜, 周文. 基于层叠条件随机场的事件因果关系抽取. 模式识别与人工智能, 2011, 24(4): 567-573) [15] Liu Zong-Tian, Huang Mei-Li, Zhou Wen, Zhong Zhao-Man, Fu Jian-Feng, Shan Jian-Fang, Zhi Hui-Lai. Research on event-oriented ontology model. Computer Science, 2009, 36(11): 189-192, 199 (刘宗田, 黄美丽, 周文, 仲兆满, 付剑锋, 单建芳, 智慧来. 面向事件的本体研究. 计算机科学, 2009, 36(11): 189-192, 199) [16] Singh S, Sedory S A. Sufficient bootstrapping. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2011, 55(4): 1629-1637 [17] Levenshtein V I. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 1966, 10(8): 707-710
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1689
- HTML全文浏览量: 91
- PDF下载量: 761
- 被引次数: 0